Benoı̂t Folléas
Impact in
- Pharmaceutical Science top 2%
- Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
Papers in
-
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms 8
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 6
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 4
- Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry 4
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 3
- Catalytic Alkyne Reactions 2
-
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis 4
- Co-authors
- Jean‐Louis Brayer (13 shared papers)Ilan Marek (2 shared papers)Jean‐F. Normant (2 shared papers)Sylvain Darses (3 shared papers)Janine Cossy (8 shared papers)Christophe Meyer (8 shared papers)Jean‐Pierre Demoute (8 shared papers)Géraldine Masson (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Benoı̂t Folléas
17 papers receiving 636 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Pharmaceutical Science 198
- Organic Chemistry 478
- Inorganic Chemistry 217
- Process Chemistry and Technology 12
- Pharmacology 52
Countries citing papers authored by Benoı̂t Folléas
This map shows the geographic impact of Benoı̂t Folléas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoı̂t Folléas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoı̂t Folléas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benoı̂t Folléas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoı̂t Folléas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoı̂t Folléas. The network helps show where Benoı̂t Folléas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Benoı̂t Folléas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 109 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 85 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 76 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 69 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 55 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 25 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 0 |
About Benoı̂t Folléas
Benoı̂t Folléas is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (8 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (6 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (4 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (4 papers), Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry (4 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (3 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (3 papers) and Catalytic Alkyne Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (198 citations), Organic Chemistry (478 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (217 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (12 citations) and Pharmacology (52 citations). Benoı̂t Folléas has collaborated with scholars based in France and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Louis Brayer, Ilan Marek, Jean‐F. Normant, Sylvain Darses, Janine Cossy, Christophe Meyer, Jean‐Pierre Demoute, Géraldine Masson, Long He and Pascal Retailleau. Their work appears in journals such as Organic Letters, Tetrahedron Letters, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Chemistry - A European Journal and European Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.