Benoît Côté

3.5k citations
123 papers · 2.8k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Benoît Côté

117 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Benoît Côté
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.2k
  • Instrumentation 184
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 574
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 536
  • Soil Science 344
Replace Jeffrey S. Kern with:
Jeffrey S. Kern United States
Aaron Miller United States
Mikko Tuomi United Kingdom
Xin Guan China
Giovanni Peres Italy
Juan F. Gallardo Spain
Dominique Aubert France
Seyed Mohsen Hosseini Iran
Scott S. Knight United States
C. J. Moore Germany
Benoît Côté relative to Jeffrey S. Kern United States Jeffrey S. Kern's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Jeffrey S. Kern · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Côté

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Côté's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Côté with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Côté more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Côté

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Côté. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Côté. The network helps show where Benoît Côté may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Côté, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît Côté Line = papers co-authored together Benoît Côté links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 123 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016157
2 2018155
3 2018134
4 199988
5 201784
6 199779
7 199862
8 201760
9 201758
10
Neutron Star Mergers Might Not Be the Only Source of r -process Elements in the Milky Way
201956
11 202047
12 199447
13 198946
14 202146
15 201644
16 201843
17 202142
18 199640
19 201240
20 199439

About Benoît Côté

Benoît Côté is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Soil Science, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Instrumentation, having authored 123 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (39 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (38 papers), Forest ecology and management (24 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (21 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (20 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (13 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (12 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.2k citations), Instrumentation (184 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (574 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (536 citations) and Soil Science (344 citations). Benoît Côté has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include James W. Fyles, William H. Hendershot, Daniel Houle, Christian Ritter, Loïc D’Orangeville, Marco Pignatari, Falk Herwig, Brian W. O’Shea, Louis Marie-Olivier Duchesne and Claude Camiré. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Plant and Soil and Canadian Journal of Soil Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact