Benoît Côté

3.2k citations
111 papers · 2.2k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Benoît Côté

105 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Benoît Côté
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 843
  • Instrumentation 154
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 516
  • Soil Science 317
  • Global and Planetary Change 443
Replace Mikko Tuomi with:
Mikko Tuomi Finland
J. Kern United States
S. Brittain United States
Sebastian Wolf Switzerland
Peter A. Becker United States
J. A. Pedelty United States
E. L. Robinson United Kingdom
Enrico Arnone Italy
Mathias Hauser Switzerland
David A. Plummer Canada
Benoît Côté relative to Mikko Tuomi Finland Mikko Tuomi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Mikko Tuomi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Côté

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Côté's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Côté with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Côté more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Côté

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Côté. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Côté. The network helps show where Benoît Côté may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Côté, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît Côté Line = papers co-authored together Benoît Côté links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 111 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016140
2 2018133
3 199985
4 199779
5 201774
6 199858
7 201753
8 201751
9 199446
10 202041
11 198941
12 201641
13 199640
14 201239
15 199438
16 198738
17 200537
18 202137
19 200436
20
Nucleosynthesis imprints from different Type Ia supernova explosion scenarios and implications for galactic chemical evolution
202035

About Benoît Côté

Benoît Côté is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Soil Science, Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 111 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (34 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (31 papers), Forest ecology and management (24 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (20 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (20 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (12 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (11 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (843 citations), Instrumentation (154 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (516 citations), Soil Science (317 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (443 citations). Benoît Côté has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include James W. Fyles, William H. Hendershot, Daniel Houle, Christian Ritter, Loïc D’Orangeville, Falk Herwig, Louis Duchesne, François Courchesne, Claude Camiré and Brian W. O’Shea. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Plant and Soil, Canadian Journal of Forest Research and Canadian Journal of Soil Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact