Benjamin Piper

52 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Benjamin Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Linguistics and Language 194
  • Safety Research 249
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 370
  • Education 733
  • Statistics and Probability 99
Replace Elise Trumbull with:
Elise Trumbull United States
Stuart Luppescu United States
Joy Cumming Australia
Alison Rebeck Black United States
Stelios Orphanos United States
Yvonne L. Goddard United States
Pamela Grossman United States
Marko Neumann Germany
Linor Lea Hadar Israel
Linda van den Bergh Netherlands
Benjamin Piper relative to Elise Trumbull United States Elise Trumbull's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.0×
Elise Trumbull · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Piper. The network helps show where Benjamin Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Piper Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201896
2 201681
3 202177
4 201570
5 201466
6 201365
7 201856
8 201656
9 201552
10 201747
11 201747
12 201942
13 201539
14 201836
15 202032
16
EGRA Plus: Liberia. Program Evaluation Report.
201132
17 201831
18 201928
19 201622
20 201519

About Benjamin Piper

Benjamin Piper is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability, Linguistics and Language and Safety Research, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (19 papers), School Choice and Performance (15 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (14 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (9 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (8 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (7 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (6 papers) and Second Language Learning and Teaching (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (194 citations), Safety Research (249 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (370 citations), Education (733 citations) and Statistics and Probability (99 citations). Benjamin Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Kenya and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stephanie Simmons Zuilkowski, Barbara Trudell, Young‐Suk Grace Kim, Margaret M. Dubeck, Joseph DeStefano, Michael T. Willoughby, Katherine Merseth King, Sarah Dryden‐Peterson, Noam Angrist and Jonathan M. B. Stern. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Educational Development, Journal of Research in Reading, Reading and Writing, Frontiers in Psychology and International Review of Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact