Benjamin C.T Field

57 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Benjamin C.T Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 365
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 559
  • Physiology 325
  • Pharmacology 190
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 135
Replace Niamh M. Martin with:
Niamh M. Martin United Kingdom
Steve Deacon United Kingdom
Rodrigo Ferreira de Moura Brazil
Takafumi Tsuchiya Japan
Eriika Savontaus Finland
Liangru Zhu China
Nina Suda United States
Yanyan Jiang China
Manjunath Ramanjaneya United Kingdom
Ikuko Sato Japan
Benjamin C.T Field relative to Niamh M. Martin United Kingdom Niamh M. Martin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Niamh M. Martin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin C.T Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin C.T Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin C.T Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin C.T Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin C.T Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin C.T Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin C.T Field. The network helps show where Benjamin C.T Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin C.T Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin C.T Field Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin C.T Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012216
2 2010141
3 201096
4 201395
5 200875
6 200874
7 200955
8 201151
9 200949
10 201147
11 201044
12 201041
13 200838
14 202331
15 201130
16 201424
17 200823
18
The mechanism of action for oxyntomodulin in the regulation of obesity.
201023
19 201121
20 202218

About Benjamin C.T Field

Benjamin C.T Field is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Nutrition and Dietetics, Pharmacology and Internal Medicine, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Treatment and Management (12 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (11 papers), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (8 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers), Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (4 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (4 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (4 papers) and Diabetes and associated disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (365 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (559 citations), Physiology (325 citations), Pharmacology (190 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (135 citations). Benjamin C.T Field has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hungary and Serbia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Robert Bloom, Owais B. Chaudhri, Mohammad A. Ghatei, JAMES S. MINNION, K. McCullough, Kevin Baynes, Niamh M. Martin, Tricia Tan, Edward S. Chambers and Marilyn G. Boltz. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Endocrinology, Diabetes, International Journal of Obesity, Diabetic Medicine and Diabetes Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact