Ben Schweizer

85 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Ben Schweizer
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 624
  • Computational Mechanics 481
  • Mathematical Physics 165
  • Applied Mathematics 154
  • Mechanics of Materials 309
Replace Paolo Podio–Guidugli with:
Paolo Podio–Guidugli Italy
Johan Helsing Sweden
Éric Bonnetier France
V. P. Smyshlyaev United Kingdom
Leonid Berlyand United States
Roger Fosdick United States
Raphaèle Herbin France
Mikyoung Lim South Korea
J. R. Ockendon Slovakia
Robert Nürnberg Germany
Ben Schweizer relative to Paolo Podio–Guidugli Italy Paolo Podio–Guidugli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Paolo Podio–Guidugli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Schweizer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Schweizer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Schweizer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Schweizer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Schweizer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Schweizer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Schweizer. The network helps show where Ben Schweizer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ben Schweizer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben Schweizer Line = papers co-authored together Ben Schweizer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201054
2 201449
3 200548
4 201048
5 200646
6 200736
7 200435
8 200831
9 201129
10 200829
11 201428
12 201027
13 201226
14 201226
15 201626
16 200923
17 201722
18 200922
19 201420
20 201020

About Ben Schweizer

Ben Schweizer is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (55 papers), Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (37 papers), Composite Material Mechanics (27 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (15 papers), Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (11 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (10 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (7 papers) and Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (624 citations), Computational Mechanics (481 citations), Mathematical Physics (165 citations), Applied Mathematics (154 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (309 citations). Ben Schweizer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include Guy Bouchitté, Sergio Conti, Marco Veneroni, Mario Ohlberger, I. Pop, Patrick Henning, Andreas Rätz, Michael I. Weinstein, Robert V. Kohn and Jianfeng Lu. Their work appears in journals such as SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, Asymptotic Analysis, European Journal of Applied Mathematics and Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact