Beáta Bóné

541 citations
24 papers · 365 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Beáta Bóné

24 papers receiving 350 citations

Peers

Beáta Bóné
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 156
  • Neurology 115
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 82
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 70
  • Neurology 20
Replace Marianne de Tourtchaninoff with:
Marianne de Tourtchaninoff Belgium
David B. Burkholder United States
Ana C. Gonçalves Franco Portugal
I Taylor Australia
David Krýsl Czechia
Jung-Kyo Lee South Korea
Padmaja Kandula United States
Hime Suzuki Japan
Željka Petelin Gadže Croatia
Valentina Baro Italy
Beáta Bóné relative to Marianne de Tourtchaninoff Belgium Marianne de Tourtchaninoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18×
Marianne de Tourtchaninoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beáta Bóné

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beáta Bóné's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beáta Bóné with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beáta Bóné more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beáta Bóné

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beáta Bóné. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beáta Bóné. The network helps show where Beáta Bóné may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beáta Bóné, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beáta Bóné Line = papers co-authored together Beáta Bóné links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202372
2 201650
3 201239
4 200636
5 200830
6 202419
7 202117
8 201615
9 202113
10 201510
11 20189
12
[Epilepsy and male sexual dysfunction: etiology, diagnosis and therapy].
20068
13 20018
14 20037
15 20216
16 20176
17 20224
18 20214
19 20224
20 20192

About Beáta Bóné

Beáta Bóné is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (13 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (5 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (4 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (2 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (1 paper), Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (1 paper) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (156 citations), Neurology (115 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (82 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (70 citations) and Neurology (20 citations). Beáta Bóné has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include József Janszky, András Fogarasi, Norbert Kovács, Csilla Gyimesi, Réka A. Horváth, Alois Ebner, Reinhard Schulz, Péter Barsi, Dalma Tényi and Sámuel Komoly. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, Seizure, BMC Neurology, Frontiers in Neurology and Epilepsy & Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact