Barbara Schäpers

21 papers receiving 528 citations

Peers

Barbara Schäpers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 162
  • Computer Networks and Communications 267
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 212
  • Emergency Medicine 31
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 64
Replace P Boveroux with:
P Boveroux Belgium
David W. Frazier United States
Carlos Barrón United States
D C Michaels United States
Atushi Tanaka Japan
Toshio Utsunomiya Japan
M. W. Hamilton Australia
Ekaterina Kutafina Germany
Daniel Hornung Germany
Hans Dierckx Belgium
Barbara Schäpers relative to P Boveroux Belgium P Boveroux's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
P Boveroux · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Schäpers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Schäpers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Schäpers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Schäpers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Schäpers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Schäpers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Schäpers. The network helps show where Barbara Schäpers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Barbara Schäpers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Barbara Schäpers Line = papers co-authored together Barbara Schäpers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000168
2 202078
3 202047
4 199931
5 201531
6 201730
7 202030
8 199722
9 200120
10 200317
11 200216
12 200015
13 202014
14 19995
15 19994
16 20183
17 20172
18 20202
19 19992
20 19992

About Barbara Schäpers

Barbara Schäpers is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Epidemiology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (12 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (6 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (5 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (3 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (2 papers), Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research (2 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (2 papers) and Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (162 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (267 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (212 citations), Emergency Medicine (31 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (64 citations). Barbara Schäpers has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Russia. Frequent co-authors include T. Ackemann, W. Lange, Friedemann Müller, Klaus Jahn, Nikolaus Plesnila, Katrin Rauen, Philipp Probst, Sebastian Konietzny, Thomas Böck and B. Giese. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics, Physical Review A, Journal of Sleep Research, Chaos Solitons & Fractals and GeroScience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact