Ban Luo

646 citations
50 papers · 422 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ban Luo

48 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

Ban Luo
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Ophthalmology 109
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 180
  • Neurology 117
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 99
  • Biotechnology 26
Replace Johannes Nepp with:
Johannes Nepp Austria
Sandra Rayner United Kingdom
C. Robert Bernardino United States
Evelyne Malanchère France
Raziyeh Mahmoudzadeh United States
Robert Latkany United States
Tatsuya Yunoki Japan
Katsuhiro Onari Japan
Jeung‐Gweon Lee South Korea
Xiaokun Qi China
Ban Luo relative to Johannes Nepp Austria Johannes Nepp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Johannes Nepp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ban Luo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ban Luo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ban Luo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ban Luo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ban Luo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ban Luo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ban Luo. The network helps show where Ban Luo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ban Luo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ban Luo Line = papers co-authored together Ban Luo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202449
2 202223
3 202122
4 202121
5 202119
6 202218
7 202315
8 201714
9 202214
10 202213
11 202213
12 202112
13 202011
14 202011
15 202310
16 202210
17 20209
18 20189
19 20209
20 20228

About Ban Luo

Ban Luo is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ophthalmology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Neurology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 50 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (26 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (13 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (12 papers), Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments (8 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (7 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (7 papers) and Cancer Research and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (109 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (180 citations), Neurology (117 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (99 citations) and Biotechnology (26 citations). Ban Luo has collaborated with scholars based in China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jing Zhang, Weikun Hu, Qiuxia Wang, Gang Yuan, Nan Xiang, Ping Liu, Jun Hu, Puze Li, Xin Qi and Xiangliang Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, European Radiology, Experimental Eye Research, ACS Nano and Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact