Arthur Appel

817 citations
14 papers · 543 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Arthur Appel

14 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

Arthur Appel
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 384
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 300
  • Computational Mechanics 229
  • Geology 36
  • Human-Computer Interaction 19
Replace Peter R. Atherton with:
Peter R. Atherton United States
Darwyn Peachey Canada
Steven M. Rubin United States
Martin E. Newell United States
Kenneth E. Hoff United States
Indranil Chakravarty United States
Tiow-Seng Tan Singapore
Timothy L. Kay United States
Brian Wyvill Portugal
Craig McPheeters Canada
Arthur Appel relative to Peter R. Atherton United States Peter R. Atherton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Peter R. Atherton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Arthur Appel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arthur Appel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arthur Appel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthur Appel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Arthur Appel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arthur Appel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arthur Appel. The network helps show where Arthur Appel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Arthur Appel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Arthur Appel Line = papers co-authored together Arthur Appel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1968289
2 1967124
3 197954
4 197930
5 197617
6 19688
7 19686
8
On calculating the illusion of reality.
19685
9 20022
10 20032
11 20022
12 20032
13 19721
14 20021

About Arthur Appel

Arthur Appel is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Building and Construction, having authored 14 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (6 papers), Advancements in Photolithography Techniques (4 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (3 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (3 papers), 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications (2 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (2 papers), Digital Image Processing Techniques (2 papers) and Geological Modeling and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (384 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (300 citations), Computational Mechanics (229 citations), Geology (36 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (19 citations). Arthur Appel has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include F. James Rohlf, Peter Will, R. L. Dougherty, P.J. Wright, E.A. Burke, H. L. Tigelaar, S.S. Mahant-Shetti, Paul E. Nicollian, V.M. McNeil and K. Joyner. Their work appears in journals such as IBM Systems Journal, IBM Journal of Research and Development, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics and IFIP Congress.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact