Antonio Lanfranchi

2.2k citations
15 papers · 1.3k · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Antonio Lanfranchi

15 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Antonio Lanfranchi
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 981
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 232
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 190
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 50
  • Physiology 277
Replace J. B. Stoker with:
J. B. Stoker United Kingdom
M. Colombo Italy
G. Bolla Italy
Stacy D. Beske United States
Giovanni Battista Bolla Italy
Bianca M. Cattaneo Italy
Claudia Ferrier Switzerland
Fosca Quarti‐Trevano Italy
C Gatteschi Italy
Massimo Battistelli Italy
Antonio Lanfranchi relative to J. B. Stoker United Kingdom J. B. Stoker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
J. B. Stoker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Antonio Lanfranchi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Antonio Lanfranchi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antonio Lanfranchi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antonio Lanfranchi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Antonio Lanfranchi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antonio Lanfranchi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antonio Lanfranchi. The network helps show where Antonio Lanfranchi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Antonio Lanfranchi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Antonio Lanfranchi Line = papers co-authored together Antonio Lanfranchi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1995472
2 1998397
3 1997164
4 1997110
5 199254
6 199748
7 199320
8 200916
9 202012
10 20217
11 19947
12 19987
13
Can good surrogate end-points predict the prognosis of hypertensive patients?
19985
14 19932
15 19931

About Antonio Lanfranchi

Antonio Lanfranchi is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine, Surgery, Infectious Diseases and Neurology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (9 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (6 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (2 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (2 papers) and Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (981 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (232 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (190 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (50 citations) and Physiology (277 citations). Antonio Lanfranchi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Giuseppe Mancia, Guıdo Grassı, Gino Seravalle, Bianca M. Cattaneo, Giovanni Battista Bolla, Francesco Cavagnini, Amelia Brunani, M. Colombo, Cristina Giannattasio and Alberto Morganti. Their work appears in journals such as Hypertension, Journal of Hypertension, Cardiology, Blood Pressure and Internal and Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact