Anne Ghisla

443 citations
9 papers · 352 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 4
    • Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 2
    • Ecology and biodiversity studies 1
    • Remote Sensing in Agriculture 1
    • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 5

Anne Ghisla

9 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers

Anne Ghisla
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Ecological Modeling 68
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 122
  • Ecology 224
  • Global and Planetary Change 96
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 71
Replace Ute Bradter with:
Ute Bradter United Kingdom
Bárbara Zimbres Brazil
Rocco Labadessa Italy
Klaus Ecker Switzerland
Christopher J. Helzer United States
Dirk Wesuls Germany
Ahmet Mert Türkiye
Bruno Drolet Canada
Carlos Ciudad Spain
Amy J.S. Davis United States
Anne Ghisla relative to Ute Bradter United Kingdom Ute Bradter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Ute Bradter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Ghisla

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Ghisla's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Ghisla with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Ghisla more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Ghisla

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Ghisla. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Ghisla. The network helps show where Anne Ghisla may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Ghisla, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Ghisla Line = papers co-authored together Anne Ghisla links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2012110
2 201582
3 201370
4 201329
5 201223
6 201016
7 200914
8
OSGeo - Open Source Geospatial Foundation
20126
9
Species distribution modelling and open source GIS: why are they still so loosely connected?
20122

About Anne Ghisla

Anne Ghisla is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Plant Science and Small Animals, having authored 9 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (2 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (2 papers), Ecology and biodiversity studies (1 paper), Remote-Sensing Image Classification (1 paper) and Remote Sensing in Agriculture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (68 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (122 citations), Ecology (224 citations), Global and Planetary Change (96 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (71 citations). Anne Ghisla has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Czechia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Giovanni Bacaro, Dana Michalcová, Monika Janišová, Duccio Rocchini, Markus Neteler, Birgit Kleinschmit, Michael Förster, Giles M. Foody, Harini Nagendra and Markus Metz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Ecology, Folia Geobotanica, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Computers & Geosciences and European Journal of Wildlife Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact