Anne Claxton
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Neurology top 5%
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Neurological Disorders and Treatments
- Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Papers in
-
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 3
-
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms 2
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Graeme J. Hankey (7 shared papers)Cheng‐Fang Hsieh (3 shared papers)Rebecca Lee (3 shared papers)Gillian Mead (3 shared papers)Mansur A. Kutlubaev (3 shared papers)Maree L. Hackett (2 shared papers)Timothy R. Bates (3 shared papers)David Blacker (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Stroke (2 papers)International Journal of Stroke (2 papers)Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (1 paper)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1 paper)Sao Paulo Medical Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Anne Claxton
7 papers receiving 490 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Rehabilitation 174
- Neurology 164
- Biological Psychiatry 24
- Neurology 83
- Internal Medicine 14
Countries citing papers authored by Anne Claxton
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Claxton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Claxton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Claxton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Claxton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Claxton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Claxton. The network helps show where Anne Claxton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Anne Claxton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 192 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 121 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 89 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 57 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 43 | |
| 6 | The West Australian Intravenous Minocycline and tPA Stroke Study (WAIMATSS) | 2012 | 2 |
| 7 | The West Australian intravenous minocycline and tPA stroke study (WAIMATSS): progress update | 2013 | 1 |
About Anne Claxton
Anne Claxton is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Dermatology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (1 paper), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (1 paper), Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects (1 paper) and Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (174 citations), Neurology (164 citations), Biological Psychiatry (24 citations), Neurology (83 citations) and Internal Medicine (14 citations). Anne Claxton has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Graeme J. Hankey, Cheng‐Fang Hsieh, Rebecca Lee, Gillian Mead, Mansur A. Kutlubaev, Maree L. Hackett, Timothy R. Bates, David Blacker, David Prentice and Grace Gilmore. Their work appears in journals such as Stroke, International Journal of Stroke, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Sao Paulo Medical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.