Anne Arber

62 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Anne Arber
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Occupational Therapy 84
  • Rehabilitation 97
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 61
  • Research and Theory 10
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 303
Replace Barbara Habermann with:
Barbara Habermann United States
Barbara B. Richardson United Kingdom
Barbara J. Adamson Australia
Karen L. Harrison United Kingdom
Els Bryon Belgium
Elizabeth A. Townsend Canada
Gloria Joachim Canada
Fintan K. Sheerin Ireland
Lynn C. Koch United States
Huiqiao Huang China
Anne Arber relative to Barbara Habermann United States Barbara Habermann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Barbara Habermann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Arber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Arber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Arber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Arber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Arber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Arber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Arber. The network helps show where Anne Arber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Arber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Arber Line = papers co-authored together Anne Arber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201291
2 201567
3 200965
4 200665
5 201056
6 200152
7 200850
8 201244
9 200842
10 201838
11 200537
12 201236
13 201136
14 201336
15 201535
16 201434
17 201333
18 201631
19 201530
20 201229

About Anne Arber

Anne Arber is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (11 papers), Family Support in Illness (10 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (7 papers), Occupational and environmental lung diseases (6 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (84 citations), Rehabilitation (97 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (61 citations), Research and Theory (10 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (303 citations). Anne Arber has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sara Faithfull, Sebastian Probst, Ann Miriam Gallagher, Nicola Hughes, Kay de Vries, Sarah Li, Emma Ream, Caroline F Lucas, Nicola Beech and Anna Cox. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Oncology Nursing, International Journal of Palliative Nursing, BMC Palliative Care, Supportive Care in Cancer and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact