Anne Arber

62 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Anne Arber
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Occupational Therapy 66
  • Rehabilitation 77
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 55
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 281
  • Family Practice 17
Replace Mary Stergiou‐Kita with:
Mary Stergiou‐Kita Canada
Anne‐Cathrine Mattiasson Sweden
Jan Pringle United Kingdom
Barbara Richardson United Kingdom
Barbara Adamson Australia
Claire Surr United Kingdom
Nagia S. Ali United States
Karen Harrison United Kingdom
Theresa Wiseman United Kingdom
Lorna Rosenwax Australia
Anne Arber relative to Mary Stergiou‐Kita Canada Mary Stergiou‐Kita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Mary Stergiou‐Kita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Arber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Arber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Arber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Arber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Arber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Arber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Arber. The network helps show where Anne Arber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Arber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Arber Line = papers co-authored together Anne Arber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201266
2 201563
3 200662
4 201054
5 200954
6 200150
7 200847
8 201244
9 201836
10 201135
11 200535
12 201235
13 200834
14 201334
15 201532
16 201331
17 201431
18 201528
19 200327
20 201627

About Anne Arber

Anne Arber is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Family Support in Illness (10 papers), Occupational and environmental lung diseases (6 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (6 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (66 citations), Rehabilitation (77 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (55 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (281 citations) and Family Practice (17 citations). Anne Arber has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Sara Faithfull, Sebastian Probst, Ann Gallagher, Nicola Hughes, Kay de Vries, Sarah Li, Emma Ream, Caroline Lucas, Nicola Beech and Anna Cox. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Oncology Nursing, International Journal of Palliative Nursing, BMC Palliative Care, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Supportive Care in Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact