Annabell Halfmann

10 papers receiving 221 citations

Peers

Annabell Halfmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Applied Psychology 60
  • Communication 45
  • Information Systems and Management 35
  • Sociology and Political Science 194
  • Literature and Literary Theory 41
Replace Nicolette Rainone with:
Nicolette Rainone United States
Maria Koutamanis Netherlands
Yeo-Ju Chung South Korea
Laura Rugai Italy
Orsolya Pápay Hungary
Se-Hoon Jeong South Korea
Julia Maria Balcerowska Poland
Nikos Xanidis United Kingdom
Piotr Bereznowski Poland
Bojana Bodroža Serbia
Annabell Halfmann relative to Nicolette Rainone United States Nicolette Rainone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Nicolette Rainone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Annabell Halfmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annabell Halfmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annabell Halfmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annabell Halfmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annabell Halfmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annabell Halfmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annabell Halfmann. The network helps show where Annabell Halfmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Annabell Halfmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Annabell Halfmann Line = papers co-authored together Annabell Halfmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201971
2 202248
3 202131
4 202026
5 202122
6 201910
7 20239
8
Trait mindfulness and problematic smartphone use
20185
9 20184
10 20242
11 20250
12
Wer bestimmt, wann du mobil kommunizierst? Die Effekte von Erreichbarkeitsdruck auf Selbstkontrolle, Bedürfnisbefriedigung, Wohlbefinden und Stress
20180

About Annabell Halfmann

Annabell Halfmann is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Information Systems and Management and Communication, having authored 12 papers that have together received 228 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper) and Digital Games and Media (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (60 citations), Communication (45 citations), Information Systems and Management (35 citations), Sociology and Political Science (194 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (41 citations). Annabell Halfmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Diana Rieger, Leonard Reinecke, Adrian Meier, Mariek Vanden Abeele, Edmund W. J. Lee, Peter Vorderer, Frank M. Schneider, Lara N. Wolfers, Hartmut Weßler and Dorothée Hefner. Their work appears in journals such as Mobile Media & Communication, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Annals of the International Communication Association, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly and Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact