Annabel Shaw

436 citations
13 papers · 275 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Annabel Shaw

13 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Annabel Shaw
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Oncology 172
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 46
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 40
  • Surgery 50
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 17
Replace Toshiaki Wada with:
Toshiaki Wada Japan
David J. Gilderdale United Kingdom
Susanne C. Göhde Switzerland
Francis W. Cutruzzola United States
Yota Mizuno Japan
Adam W. Templeton United States
Barbara Cannillo Italy
Y. Fujiyama Japan
Gary B. Hayes United States
He Wen China
Annabel Shaw relative to Toshiaki Wada Japan Toshiaki Wada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Toshiaki Wada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Annabel Shaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annabel Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annabel Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annabel Shaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annabel Shaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annabel Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annabel Shaw. The network helps show where Annabel Shaw may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Annabel Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Annabel Shaw Line = papers co-authored together Annabel Shaw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2020128
2 202026
3 201926
4 201825
5 195519
6 196519
7 201911
8 196411
9 20135
10 19622
11 20241
12 20181
13 19991

About Annabel Shaw

Annabel Shaw is a scholar working on Oncology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Surgery, having authored 13 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (7 papers), Vacuum and Plasma Arcs (3 papers), Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1 paper), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (1 paper) and Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (172 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (46 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (40 citations), Surgery (50 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (17 citations). Annabel Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Nigel D’Souza, Amy Lord, Gina Brown, Muti Abulafi, Shahnawaz Rasheed, Brendan Moran, Alison Corr, Anuradha Chandramohan, Ian Chau and D. Whittaker. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Annals of Surgery, Nature, International Journal of Colorectal Disease and Cancer Treatment Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact