Anna S. John

976 citations
13 papers · 719 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Anna S. John

13 papers receiving 682 citations

Peers

Anna S. John
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 420
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 252
  • Microbiology 30
  • Epidemiology 105
  • Aging 4
Replace Benjamin L. Siu with:
Benjamin L. Siu United States
Sylvia Kinzel Germany
Sujeev Mathur United Kingdom
Hideaki Ikejima Japan
Su‐chiung Chen United States
Nobuyuki Ogasawara Japan
M. Killich Germany
Sonia Jain United States
Ursula Scholz Germany
Alessandra Scatteia Italy
Anna S. John relative to Benjamin L. Siu United States Benjamin L. Siu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Benjamin L. Siu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna S. John

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna S. John's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna S. John with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna S. John more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna S. John

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna S. John. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna S. John. The network helps show where Anna S. John may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna S. John, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna S. John Line = papers co-authored together Anna S. John links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2003140
2 2003138
3 2004129
4 2004113
5 199853
6 200339
7 200725
8 200720
9 200519
10 200714
11 202313
12 200210
13 20036

About Anna S. John

Anna S. John is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Small Animals and Molecular Biology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 719 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (1 paper), Heat shock proteins research (1 paper), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (1 paper), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (1 paper) and Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (420 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (252 citations), Microbiology (30 citations), Epidemiology (105 citations) and Aging (4 citations). Anna S. John has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Dudley J. Pennell, Thorsten Dill, Christian W. Hamm, Georg Bachmann, Matthias Rau, Roland R. Brandt, Gilles Dreyfus, James Moon, Andrew G. Elkington and Thomas Neumann. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact