Anna Mead
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
-
- Corneal Surgery and Treatments
- Corneal surgery and disorders
Papers in
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 3
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 1
-
- Corneal Surgery and Treatments 2
- Corneal surgery and disorders 2
- Co-authors
- Peng T. Khaw (5 shared papers)Tina Wong (4 shared papers)M. Francesca Cordeiro (3 shared papers)Ian K. Anderson (1 shared paper)Lydia Chang (1 shared paper)Julie T. Daniels (1 shared paper)Robin R. Ali (1 shared paper)Gregory S. Schultz (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (3 papers)Gene Therapy (1 paper)Current Opinion in Ophthalmology (1 paper)Eye (1 paper)International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Anna Mead
7 papers receiving 599 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Ophthalmology 240
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 142
- Rehabilitation 37
- Dermatology 23
- Cancer Research 37
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Mead
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Mead more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Mead
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Mead. The network helps show where Anna Mead may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Anna Mead, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 183 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 149 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 93 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 93 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 66 | |
| 6 | An interophthalmic communicating artery as explanation for the consensual irritative response of the rabbit eye. | 1979 | 23 |
| 7 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 0 |
About Anna Mead
Anna Mead is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Gender Studies and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 610 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (2 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper) and Diversity and Career in Medicine (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (240 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (142 citations), Rehabilitation (37 citations), Dermatology (23 citations) and Cancer Research (37 citations). Anna Mead has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Peng T. Khaw, Tina Wong, M. Francesca Cordeiro, Ian K. Anderson, Lydia Chang, Julie T. Daniels, Robin R. Ali, Gregory S. Schultz, Robert Alexander and Nicholas M. Dean. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Gene Therapy, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, Eye and International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.