Anna Mead
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
-
- Corneal Surgery and Treatments
- Corneal surgery and disorders
Papers in
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 3
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 2
-
- Corneal surgery and disorders 3
- Corneal Surgery and Treatments 2
- Co-authors
- Peng T. Khaw (6 shared papers)Tina Wong (4 shared papers)M. Francesca Cordeiro (3 shared papers)Ian K. Anderson (2 shared papers)Julie T. Daniels (1 shared paper)Robert Alexander (1 shared paper)Nicholas M. Dean (1 shared paper)Gregory S. Schultz (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (4 papers)Current Opinion in Ophthalmology (1 paper)Gene Therapy (1 paper)Eye (1 paper)International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Anna Mead
8 papers receiving 615 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Ophthalmology 258
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 157
- Rehabilitation 39
- Dermatology 23
- Molecular Biology 187
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Mead
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Mead more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Mead
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Mead. The network helps show where Anna Mead may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Anna Mead, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 194 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 155 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 98 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 97 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 69 | |
| 6 | An interophthalmic communicating artery as explanation for the consensual irritative response of the rabbit eye. | 1979 | 24 |
| 7 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 8 | The Efficacy of CAT–152 in the Prevention of Posterior Capsular Opacification (PCO) in the Rabbit Model of Cataract Surgery and Lens Implantation | 2005 | 1 |
| 9 | 2019 | 0 |
About Anna Mead
Anna Mead is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Epidemiology and Gender Studies, having authored 9 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper) and Diversity and Career in Medicine (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (258 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (157 citations), Rehabilitation (39 citations), Dermatology (23 citations) and Molecular Biology (187 citations). Anna Mead has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Peng T. Khaw, Tina Wong, M. Francesca Cordeiro, Ian K. Anderson, Julie T. Daniels, Robert Alexander, Nicholas M. Dean, Gregory S. Schultz, Sue Murray and Lydia Chang. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, Gene Therapy, Eye and International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.