Anna Brecht

1.5k citations
6 papers · 281 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Brecht

5 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Anna Brecht
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 130
  • Occupational Therapy 13
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 85
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 60
  • Cancer Research 33
Replace Mulei Chen with:
Mulei Chen China
Michelle Ouellette United States
Cecilia Kennbäck Sweden
Lyn Almon United States
Zhenguo Wu China
Steven Nissen United States
Martin F. Muers United Kingdom
Jayakumar Karunakaran India
Paolo Spontoni Italy
Ardaas Kanwar United States
Anna Brecht relative to Mulei Chen China Mulei Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32×
Mulei Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Brecht

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Brecht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Brecht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Brecht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Brecht

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Brecht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Brecht. The network helps show where Anna Brecht may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Brecht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Brecht Line = papers co-authored together Anna Brecht links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 201699
2 201259
3 201256
4 201050
5 201617
6 20240

About Anna Brecht

Anna Brecht is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 6 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (1 paper), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (1 paper), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (1 paper) and Child Abuse and Related Trauma (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (130 citations), Occupational Therapy (13 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (85 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (60 citations) and Cancer Research (33 citations). Anna Brecht has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Gert Baumann, Cornelia Bartsch, Karl Stangl, Thomas Dschietzig, Sabine Oertelt‐Prigione, Ute Seeland, Fabian Knebel, Verena Stangl, Vera Regitz‐Zagrosek and Konstantin Alexiou. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, Regulatory Peptides, Child Abuse & Neglect, Bioscience Reports and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact