Andrew Mitchell

606 citations
13 papers · 391 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew Mitchell

11 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers

Andrew Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 206
  • Microbiology 96
  • Infectious Diseases 232
  • Epidemiology 135
  • Small Animals 21
Replace Jordon Graham with:
Jordon Graham United Kingdom
Inma Aznar United States
T.G. Kimman Netherlands
Gideon Brückner South Africa
J. Grom Slovenia
V. Rodríguez-Prieto Spain
P. Upton United Kingdom
Anton Gerilovych Ukraine
Johannes Storz United States
Rachel E. Burns United States
Andrew Mitchell relative to Jordon Graham United Kingdom Jordon Graham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jordon Graham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Mitchell. The network helps show where Andrew Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2008112
2 2012110
3 201237
4 201529
5 201826
6 201722
7 201922
8 201813
9
The rain forests of home : an atlas of people and place
199510
10 20129
11 20241
12 20250
13
The vanishing paradise
19900

About Andrew Mitchell

Andrew Mitchell is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Microbiology and Ecology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (7 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (6 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (5 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (1 paper), Injection Molding Process and Properties (1 paper) and Mineral Processing and Grinding (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (206 citations), Microbiology (96 citations), Infectious Diseases (232 citations), Epidemiology (135 citations) and Small Animals (21 citations). Andrew Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include István Z. Kiss, Darren M. Green, Rowland R. Kao, Andrew J. K. Conlan, Trevelyan J. McKinley, James L. N. Wood, Richard S. Clifton‐Hadley, A. V. Goodchild, Ellen Brooks‐Pollock and Colin Birch. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, PLoS Computational Biology, Scientific Reports, Ecology and Evolution and Powder Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact