Andrew E. Werchniak

26 papers receiving 470 citations

Peers

Andrew E. Werchniak
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Virology 61
  • Dermatology 113
  • Oncology 200
  • Epidemiology 162
  • Genetics 23
Replace T. Schultewolter with:
T. Schultewolter Germany
Takaoki Ishiji Japan
Anupama Salvekar United States
T Sobande United Kingdom
Uyen Ngoc Mui United States
Kazuo Yanagi Japan
Hendrik J. Hulsebosch Netherlands
Priscila R. Andrade Brazil
Oscar Haigh France
Kalyan C. Nallaparaju United States
Andrew E. Werchniak relative to T. Schultewolter Germany T. Schultewolter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.8×
T. Schultewolter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew E. Werchniak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew E. Werchniak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew E. Werchniak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew E. Werchniak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew E. Werchniak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew E. Werchniak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew E. Werchniak. The network helps show where Andrew E. Werchniak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew E. Werchniak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew E. Werchniak Line = papers co-authored together Andrew E. Werchniak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014131
2 200465
3 201546
4
Lentigo maligna (melanoma in situ) treated with imiquimod cream 5%: 12 case reports.
200733
5 201031
6 201526
7 201124
8 200522
9 201522
10 200420
11 200317
12 200415
13 200411
14 20218
15 20176
16 20216
17 20124
18 20034
19 20132
20 20072

About Andrew E. Werchniak

Andrew E. Werchniak is a scholar working on Dermatology, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology and Small Animals, having authored 26 papers that have together received 502 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer and Skin Lesions (5 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (4 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (4 papers), Tumors and Oncological Cases (3 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (3 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (3 papers), Infectious Diseases and Mycology (3 papers) and Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (61 citations), Dermatology (113 citations), Oncology (200 citations), Epidemiology (162 citations) and Genetics (23 citations). Andrew E. Werchniak has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jason J. Luke, Ruth Ann Vleugels, Shirwa Sheik Ali, Derrick J. Todd, James G. Dinulos, Scott R. Granter, Jeoffry B. Brennick, Kathryn Schwarzenberger, Sidney N. Klaus and Jeffrey M. Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, JAMA Dermatology, Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact