Andrew Cherrill

53 papers receiving 662 citations

Peers

Andrew Cherrill
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Ecological Modeling 193
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 379
  • Ecology 336
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 246
  • Insect Science 150
Replace Corinne Watts with:
Corinne Watts New Zealand
Debra M. Wotton New Zealand
Peggy L. Fiedler United States
Catarina Melo Portugal
Agustín Naranjo Cigala Spain
Gillian L. Rapson New Zealand
Loïc Valéry France
Rosamonde R. Cook United States
Philip Lambdon United Kingdom
Jesse Bellemare United States
Andrew Cherrill relative to Corinne Watts New Zealand Corinne Watts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Corinne Watts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Cherrill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Cherrill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Cherrill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Cherrill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Cherrill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Cherrill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Cherrill. The network helps show where Andrew Cherrill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Cherrill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Cherrill Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Cherrill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199592
2 199546
3 199940
4 199538
5 200932
6 199229
7 199525
8 199924
9 199023
10
Distribution, biomass and effect on native species of Impatiens glandulifera in a deciduous woodland in northeast England.
200022
11 198722
12 199022
13 201920
14 199320
15 199419
16 200219
17 198917
18 198516
19 198716
20 199114

About Andrew Cherrill

Andrew Cherrill is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 53 papers that have together received 758 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (22 papers), Orthoptera Research and Taxonomy (11 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (10 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (9 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (8 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (193 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (379 citations), Ecology (336 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (246 citations) and Insect Science (150 citations). Andrew Cherrill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Colin J. McClean, V. K. Brown, Stephen P. Rushton, Roy Sanderson, R.E. James, Michael Begon, R. M. Fuller, Andrew M. Lane, M. Andrews and Steve Rushton. Their work appears in journals such as Landscape Ecology, Journal of Orthoptera Research, Biological Conservation, Landscape Research and Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact