Andreas Schäffer

9 papers receiving 459 citations

Peers

Andreas Schäffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 139
  • Inorganic Chemistry 119
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 57
  • Surgery 147
  • Cancer Research 38
Replace Jérôme Devoy with:
Jérôme Devoy France
James B. Mangum United States
Christy A. Emond United States
Maryse Lemaire Canada
Juan José Rodríguez Mexico
J. Edel Italy
Xuyang Chen China
Frank L. Van de Vyver Belgium
J.P.W. Houtman Netherlands
J. R. Hailey United States
Andreas Schäffer relative to Jérôme Devoy France Jérôme Devoy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Jérôme Devoy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andreas Schäffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas Schäffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas Schäffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas Schäffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas Schäffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas Schäffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas Schäffer. The network helps show where Andreas Schäffer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andreas Schäffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andreas Schäffer Line = papers co-authored together Andreas Schäffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1999142
2 200279
3 200879
4 200041
5 200237
6 200232
7 200227
8 200122
9 200220

About Andreas Schäffer

Andreas Schäffer is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Inorganic Chemistry, Water Science and Technology, Surgery and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vanadium and Halogenation Chemistry (3 papers), Fluoride Effects and Removal (2 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper), Air Quality and Health Impacts (1 paper), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (1 paper), Liver Disease and Transplantation (1 paper) and Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (139 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (119 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (57 citations), Surgery (147 citations) and Cancer Research (38 citations). Andreas Schäffer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Pilger, Hugo W. Rüdiger, Hugo W. Ruediger, W. Osterode, Sabine Ivancsits, Elisabeth Diem, Robert Winker, Alfred Barth, Karl‐Heinz Wagner and Christine Hoelzl. Their work appears in journals such as International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, Environmental Health Perspectives and The International Journal of Artificial Organs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact