Amy Proctor

1k citations
19 papers · 756 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Amy Proctor

19 papers receiving 723 citations

Peers

Amy Proctor
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 227
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 70
  • Development 25
  • Geography, Planning and Development 51
  • Speech and Hearing 31
Replace Paul V. Stock with:
Paul V. Stock United States
Jana Zscheischler Germany
Ruth A. Nettle Australia
Annemarie van Paassen Netherlands
Jostein Vik Norway
Alex Franklin United Kingdom
Matthew Reed United Kingdom
Connie Chan‐Kang United States
Carol Richards Australia
Áine Macken‐Walsh Ireland
Amy Proctor relative to Paul V. Stock United States Paul V. Stock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×23.3×
Paul V. Stock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Proctor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Proctor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Proctor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Proctor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Proctor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Proctor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Proctor. The network helps show where Amy Proctor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Amy Proctor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy Proctor Line = papers co-authored together Amy Proctor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2011193
2 2012150
3 2005113
4 201884
5 201151
6 201633
7 201227
8 202024
9 202117
10 201115
11 202211
12 20249
13 20228
14 20206
15 20236
16 20244
17 20232
18 20242
19 20241

About Amy Proctor

Amy Proctor is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 756 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (5 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Rural development and sustainability (3 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (2 papers), Agricultural Development and Management (2 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (2 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (2 papers) and Agriculture and Rural Development Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (227 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (70 citations), Development (25 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (51 citations) and Speech and Hearing (31 citations). Amy Proctor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Philip D. Lowe, Jeremy Phillipson, Laurens Klerkx, Eric Ruto, Pauline Deutz, David C. Gibbs, Menelaos Gkartzios, Andrew J. Donaldson, Lewis Holloway and Beth Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Rural Studies, Land Use Policy, Veterinary Record, Environment and Planning E Nature and Space and Agriculture and Human Values.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact