Amos Notea

557 citations
68 papers · 474 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Amos Notea

65 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

Amos Notea
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Radiation 259
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 49
  • Structural Biology 11
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 101
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 31
Replace R.P. Kensek with:
R.P. Kensek United States
C. Tintori Italy
Greg D. Valdez United States
J. Michael Doster United States
Y. Li United States
Andrea Coronetti Switzerland
David M. Benton United Kingdom
J. H. Stephen United Kingdom
A. Iluk Poland
M. Comunian Italy
Amos Notea relative to R.P. Kensek United States R.P. Kensek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.1×
R.P. Kensek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amos Notea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amos Notea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amos Notea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amos Notea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amos Notea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amos Notea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amos Notea. The network helps show where Amos Notea may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amos Notea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amos Notea Line = papers co-authored together Amos Notea links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197149
2 196737
3 199333
4 200027
5 196824
6 196918
7 197418
8 198217
9 199016
10 197015
11 199412
12 198111
13 198910
14 199910
15 198310
16 19949
17 19839
18 19948
19 19868
20 19748

About Amos Notea

Amos Notea is a scholar working on Radiation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Surfaces, Coatings and Films, having authored 68 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear Physics and Applications (31 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (16 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (14 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (11 papers), Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (6 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (6 papers), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (5 papers) and Non-Destructive Testing Techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (259 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (49 citations), Structural Biology (11 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (101 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (31 citations). Amos Notea has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Ezra Elias, R. Chechik, A. Breskin, Moshe Deutsch, Itzhak Shmulevich, Ze’ev Schmilovitch, Ephraim Maltz, Dov Ingman, Arie L. Gutman and T. E. Feuchtwang. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Technology, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Surface Science, NDT & E International and Nuclear Science and Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact