Amit Mohan

935 citations
57 papers · 576 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Amit Mohan

50 papers receiving 542 citations

Peers

Amit Mohan
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Ophthalmology 121
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 10
  • Social Psychology 112
  • Clinical Psychology 68
  • Human-Computer Interaction 20
Replace Misae Ito with:
Misae Ito Japan
Jameel Rizwana Hussaindeen India
Elise B. Ciner United States
Catherine Best United Kingdom
Joan K. Portello United States
Patricia M Kiely Australia
BRUCE D. MOORE United States
Valerija Tadić United Kingdom
Peter D. Clark United States
YH Chan Singapore
Amit Mohan relative to Misae Ito Japan Misae Ito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
Misae Ito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amit Mohan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amit Mohan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amit Mohan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amit Mohan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amit Mohan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amit Mohan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amit Mohan. The network helps show where Amit Mohan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amit Mohan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amit Mohan Line = papers co-authored together Amit Mohan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020178
2 201164
3 202138
4 202128
5 201927
6 201325
7 201925
8 201719
9 201819
10
Assessment of computer game as a psychological stressor.
200717
11 20179
12 20098
13 20188
14 20208
15 20187
16 20207
17 20176
18 20176
19 20196
20 20055

About Amit Mohan

Amit Mohan is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 57 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (9 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (2 papers) and Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (121 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (10 citations), Social Psychology (112 citations), Clinical Psychology (68 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (20 citations). Amit Mohan has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Pradhnya Sen, Elesh Jain, Chintan Shah, Swapnil Jain, Ratna Sharma, Ramesh Lal Bijlani, Alok C. Sen, Vikram Shetty, Nidhi Gupta and R.M. Pandey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Indian Journal of Ophthalmology and Journal of Ect.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact