Amina Khan

1.2k citations
40 papers · 230 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Amina Khan

30 papers receiving 224 citations

Peers

Amina Khan
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Cancer Research 124
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 62
  • Dermatology 23
  • Oncology 47
  • Surgery 44
Replace Kwang Hyun Yoon with:
Kwang Hyun Yoon South Korea
Federico Frusone Italy
Emin Yıldırım Türkiye
A.B.G. Kwast Netherlands
Valérie Théberge Canada
P. Borgen United States
Valerie L. Staradub United States
Souzan E. El‐Eid United States
Starr Koslow Mautner United States
Aeisha Rivers United States
Amina Khan relative to Kwang Hyun Yoon South Korea Kwang Hyun Yoon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Kwang Hyun Yoon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amina Khan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amina Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amina Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amina Khan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amina Khan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amina Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amina Khan. The network helps show where Amina Khan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amina Khan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amina Khan Line = papers co-authored together Amina Khan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200569
2 200417
3 201816
4 201914
5 201413
6 201912
7 201711
8
Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: Prognostic Variables And Tumour Markers Affecting Survival.
201910
9 20228
10 20148
11 20155
12 20175
13 20145
14 20215
15 20174
16 20173
17 20163
18 20063
19
Research in Somalia: Opportunities for Cooperation
20203
20 20172

About Amina Khan

Amina Khan is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 40 papers that have together received 230 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (15 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (5 papers), Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (3 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3 papers), Medical and Biological Sciences (2 papers) and Belt and Road Initiative (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (124 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (62 citations), Dermatology (23 citations), Oncology (47 citations) and Surgery (44 citations). Amina Khan has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lisa A. Newman, Michael S. Sabel, Alfred E. Chang, D F Hayes, Celina G. Kleer, Vincent M. Cimmino, Anne F. Schott, Kathleen M. Diehl, Alexis V. Nees and Muhammad Jawad Khan. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Surgical Oncology, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, World Journal of Surgery, BioMed Research International and Andrology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact