Amelie Echle

10 papers receiving 674 citations

Amelie Echle's Hit Papers

Deep learning in cancer pathology: a new generation of clinical biomarkers 2020 · 406 citations
4060+2+4Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Amelie Echle
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Health Informatics 63
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 281
  • Biophysics 70
  • Artificial Intelligence 354
  • Cancer Research 97
Replace Ole-Johan Skrede with:
Ole-Johan Skrede Norway
Meriem Sefta France
Pierre Courtiol France
Charlie Saillard France
Benoît Schmauch France
Andreas Kleppe Norway
Pooya Mobadersany United States
Mane Williams United States
Jeremias Krause Germany
Anurag Vaidya United States
Amelie Echle relative to Ole-Johan Skrede Norway Ole-Johan Skrede's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Ole-Johan Skrede · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amelie Echle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amelie Echle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amelie Echle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amelie Echle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amelie Echle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amelie Echle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amelie Echle. The network helps show where Amelie Echle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amelie Echle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amelie Echle Line = papers co-authored together Amelie Echle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
Deep learning in cancer pathology: a new generation of clinical biomarkers
Hit paper breakdown →
2020406
2 202158
3 202156
4 202156
5 202135
6 202222
7 202218
8 202017
9 202213
10
Deep Learning for interpretable end-to-end survival (E-ESurv) prediction in gastrointestinal cancer histopathology
20212

About Amelie Echle

Amelie Echle is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Oncology, Cancer Research and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 683 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (7 papers), AI in cancer detection (7 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers), Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis (1 paper), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (1 paper) and Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (63 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (281 citations), Biophysics (70 citations), Artificial Intelligence (354 citations) and Cancer Research (97 citations). Amelie Echle has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jakob Nikolas Kather, Titus J. Brinker, Alexander T. Pearson, Tom Luedde, Niklas Rindtorff, Heike I. Grabsch, Philip Quirke, Narmin Ghaffari Laleh, Christian Trautwein and Lara R. Heij. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Pathology, Frontiers in Genetics, Histopathology, British Journal of Cancer and The Journal of Pathology Clinical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact