Amelia Acker

891 citations
58 papers · 547 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Amelia Acker

53 papers receiving 511 citations

Peers

Amelia Acker
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Conservation 49
  • Information Systems and Management 87
  • Communication 82
  • Human-Computer Interaction 51
  • Computer Science Applications 41
Replace Jens‐Erik Mai with:
Jens‐Erik Mai Denmark
Ali Shiri Canada
Cory Knobel United States
David M. Berry United Kingdom
Peter Mechant Belgium
Jason Schultz United States
Luke Tredinnick United Kingdom
Jan Nolin Sweden
Gillian Oliver Australia
Viktor Mayer‐Schönberger United States
Amelia Acker relative to Jens‐Erik Mai Denmark Jens‐Erik Mai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Jens‐Erik Mai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amelia Acker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amelia Acker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amelia Acker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amelia Acker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amelia Acker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amelia Acker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amelia Acker. The network helps show where Amelia Acker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amelia Acker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amelia Acker Line = papers co-authored together Amelia Acker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201761
2 201946
3 202044
4 201830
5
Death, Memorialization, and Social Media: A Platform Perspective for Personal Archives
201428
6 201528
7 201928
8 202224
9 201718
10 201716
11 201416
12 201815
13 201813
14 202311
15 202011
16 201311
17 201610
18 20159
19 20248
20 20168

About Amelia Acker

Amelia Acker is a scholar working on Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Conservation, Information Systems and Management and Communication, having authored 58 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital and Traditional Archives Management (13 papers), Research Data Management Practices (10 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (5 papers), Data Quality and Management (4 papers) and ICT in Developing Communities (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (49 citations), Information Systems and Management (87 citations), Communication (82 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (51 citations) and Computer Science Applications (41 citations). Amelia Acker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Dhiraj Murthy, Leanne Bowler, Andrew Iliadis, Yu Chi, Wei Jeng, Jed R. Brubaker, Joan Donovan, Adam Kriesberg, Matthew S. Mayernik and Martin B. H. Weiss. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Information Communication & Society, Telematics and Informatics and Big Data & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact