Amelia Acker

53 papers receiving 547 citations

Peers

Amelia Acker
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Conservation 56
  • Information Systems and Management 86
  • Communication 84
  • Human-Computer Interaction 53
  • Computer Science Applications 43
Replace Jens‐Erik Mai with:
Jens‐Erik Mai United States
Matthew Kirschenbaum United States
Trevor Owens United States
Ali Asghar Shiri Canada
Gillian Oliver Australia
Alex H. Poole United States
Luke Tredinnick United Kingdom
Jan Michael Nolin Sweden
Steve Probets United Kingdom
Heather Lea Moulaison United States
Amelia Acker relative to Jens‐Erik Mai United States Jens‐Erik Mai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Jens‐Erik Mai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amelia Acker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amelia Acker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amelia Acker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amelia Acker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amelia Acker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amelia Acker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amelia Acker. The network helps show where Amelia Acker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amelia Acker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amelia Acker Line = papers co-authored together Amelia Acker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201767
2 201954
3 202047
4
Death, Memorialization, and Social Media: A Platform Perspective for Personal Archives
201432
5 201830
6 202230
7 201928
8 201522
9 201717
10 201717
11 201816
12 201416
13 201815
14 202313
15 201312
16 202012
17 202011
18 202410
19 201510
20 20169

About Amelia Acker

Amelia Acker is a scholar working on Conservation, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Communication and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 58 papers that have together received 587 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Research Data Management Practices (12 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (12 papers), Social Media and Politics (8 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (7 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (6 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (5 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (5 papers) and Data Quality and Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (56 citations), Information Systems and Management (86 citations), Communication (84 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (53 citations) and Computer Science Applications (43 citations). Amelia Acker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Dhiraj Murthy, Leanne Bowler, Andrew Iliadis, Wei Jeng, Yu Chi, Jed R. Brubaker, Joan Donovan, Adam Kriesberg, Matthew S. Mayernik and Daniel Carter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Big Data & Society, Information Communication & Society and Telematics and Informatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact