Amanda Scott
Impact in
- Speech and Hearing top 2%
- Dysphagia Assessment and Management
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Papers in
- History 3
- European Political History Analysis 1
- Medieval and Early Modern Iberia 1
- Co-authors
- Alison Perry (1 shared paper)John Bench (1 shared paper)Philip E. Tetlock (2 shared papers)Derek D. Rucker (1 shared paper)Penny S. Visser (1 shared paper)Ramadhar Singh (1 shared paper)Philip J. Mazzocco (1 shared paper)Hilary Johnson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Dysphagia (2 papers)Technical Communication Quarterly (1 paper)Church History (1 paper)Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (1 paper)Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaSingapore
In The Last Decade
Amanda Scott
13 papers receiving 315 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Speech and Hearing 116
- Cognitive Neuroscience 100
- General Decision Sciences 7
- Social Psychology 63
- Safety Research 26
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Scott. The network helps show where Amanda Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 109 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 92 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 88 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 6 | A Practical Approach to Saliva Control | 1993 | 9 |
| 7 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 0 |
About Amanda Scott
Amanda Scott is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Basque language and culture studies (2 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (2 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (2 papers), European Political History Analysis (1 paper), Medieval and Early Modern Iberia (1 paper) and Aging and Gerontology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (116 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (100 citations), General Decision Sciences (7 citations), Social Psychology (63 citations) and Safety Research (26 citations). Amanda Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Alison Perry, John Bench, Philip E. Tetlock, Derek D. Rucker, Penny S. Visser, Ramadhar Singh, Philip J. Mazzocco, Alison Perry, Hilary Johnson and Gita Bhutani. Their work appears in journals such as Dysphagia, Technical Communication Quarterly, Church History, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.