Amanda J. Wright

1.7k citations
66 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Amanda J. Wright

62 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Amanda J. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 55
  • Biophysics 292
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 688
  • Biomedical Engineering 680
  • Media Technology 70
Replace Chao He with:
Chao He United Kingdom
Benoit F. Wattellier France
Xiaosong S. Gan Australia
Francisco E. Robles United States
Lynn Paterson United Kingdom
Kung‐Bin Sung Taiwan
Yu‐Xuan Ren China
Hideharu Mikami Japan
Takeo Minamikawa Japan
Zsolt John Laczik United Kingdom
Amanda J. Wright relative to Chao He United Kingdom Chao He's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Chao He · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda J. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda J. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda J. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda J. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda J. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda J. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda J. Wright. The network helps show where Amanda J. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda J. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda J. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Amanda J. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008154
2 200680
3 200579
4 200778
5 200974
6 200570
7 201065
8 200754
9 201952
10 200645
11 200442
12 201141
13 200837
14 202434
15 201330
16 200825
17 200824
18 200622
19 202322
20 200916

About Amanda J. Wright

Amanda J. Wright is a scholar working on Biophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Media Technology and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (25 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (15 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (14 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (12 papers), Digital Holography and Microscopy (9 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (7 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (5 papers) and Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (55 citations), Biophysics (292 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (688 citations), Biomedical Engineering (680 citations) and Media Technology (70 citations). Amanda J. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include John M. Girkin, Miles J. Padgett, Simon P. Poland, Jonathan Leach, Graham M. Gibson, Stephen Keen, Richard W Bowman, Brett A. Patterson, D. Burns and Niall McAlinden. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Physical Review Letters, Journal of Optics, Journal of Biomedical Optics and Applied Optics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact