Amanda Devoto

10 papers receiving 274 citations

Amanda Devoto's Hit Papers

Bots and Misinformation Spread on Social Media: Implications for COVID-19 2021 · 149 citations
1490+1+3Years since publication4080120

Peers

Amanda Devoto
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Health 31
  • Applied Psychology 19
  • Communication 22
  • Sociology and Political Science 118
  • Clinical Psychology 42
Replace McKenzie Himelein-Wachowiak with:
McKenzie Himelein-Wachowiak United States
Garrick T. Sherman United States
Marijn ten Thij Netherlands
Gabriel Alves Desidério Brazil
Francisco Dantas Lourenço Brazil
Tae Min Song South Korea
Giovanni Spitale Switzerland
Carlos Henrique de Oliveira Brazil
Dongdong Jiao China
Dima Hadid Lebanon
Amanda Devoto relative to McKenzie Himelein-Wachowiak United States McKenzie Himelein-Wachowiak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
McKenzie Himelein-Wachowiak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Devoto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Devoto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Devoto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Devoto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Devoto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Devoto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Devoto. The network helps show where Amanda Devoto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Devoto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Devoto Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Devoto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1
Bots and Misinformation Spread on Social Media: Implications for COVID-19
Hit paper breakdown →
2021149
2 202230
3 202125
4 201623
5 202221
6 202512
7 202210
8 20198
9 20241
10 20241
11 20240
12 20220

About Amanda Devoto

Amanda Devoto is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Communication, having authored 12 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Social Media and Politics (1 paper), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (1 paper), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (31 citations), Applied Psychology (19 citations), Communication (22 citations), Sociology and Political Science (118 citations) and Clinical Psychology (42 citations). Amanda Devoto has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brenda L. Curtis, McKenzie Himelein-Wachowiak, Salvatore Giorgi, Lyle Ungar, David H. Epstein, Lorenzo Leggio, H. Andrew Schwartz, Anthony DeFulio, Tingting Liu and Michael Fingerhood. Their work appears in journals such as Drug and Alcohol Dependence, The Psychological Record, Journal of Behavioral Addictions, Perspectives on Behavior Science and Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact