A.M. Swift

561 citations
16 papers · 456 · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Nuclear physics research studies
    • Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
    • Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
    • Neutrino Physics Research
  • Radiation top 5%
    • Nuclear Physics and Applications

Papers in

A.M. Swift

15 papers receiving 430 citations

Peers

A.M. Swift
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 367
  • Radiation 123
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering 3
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 194
  • Condensed Matter Physics 62
Replace T. Kamae with:
T. Kamae Japan
Bruce L. Scott United States
R.M. Lombard France
J. Ficenec United States
D. Rapin Switzerland
Stewart D. Bloom United States
E. L. Tomusiak Canada
A. Ljubičić Croatia
C. J. Oram Canada
B. A. Mecking Germany
A.M. Swift relative to T. Kamae Japan T. Kamae's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
T. Kamae · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A.M. Swift

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.M. Swift's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.M. Swift with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.M. Swift more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.M. Swift

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.M. Swift. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.M. Swift. The network helps show where A.M. Swift may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside A.M. Swift, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A.M. Swift Line = papers co-authored together A.M. Swift links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1967273
2 196644
3 199937
4 199515
5 199415
6 199614
7 199311
8 196511
9 19648
10 19967
11 19967
12 19996
13 19966
14 19941
15 19941
16 19940

About A.M. Swift

A.M. Swift is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Condensed Matter Physics, Radiation and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconducting and THz Device Technology (9 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (8 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (7 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (2 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (2 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (2 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (367 citations), Radiation (123 citations), Nuclear Energy and Engineering (3 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (194 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (62 citations). A.M. Swift has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Lewis Elton, F. Gatti, S. Vitale, F. Fontanelli, M. Galeazzi, G.L. Salmon, N. E. Booth, D. J. Goldie, A. Hahn and Elisabetta Cosulich. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Nuclear Physics A, Nature, Journal of Low Temperature Physics and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact