Alexandra Warwick
Impact in
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Crime and Detective Fiction Studies
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
-
- Archaeological Research and Protection
Papers in
-
- Publishing and Scholarly Communication 1
-
- Irish and British Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Martin Willis (4 shared papers)Terry Eagleton (1 shared paper)Laura Chrisman (1 shared paper)Stephen Regan (1 shared paper)Ruth Robbins (1 shared paper)Anne Janowitz (1 shared paper)Carolyn Williams (1 shared paper)Sally Ledger (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nineteenth Century Contexts (1 paper)Gothic Studies (1 paper)City (1 paper)Social & Legal Studies (1 paper)Anthem Press eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Alexandra Warwick
8 papers receiving 43 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Literature and Literary Theory 26
- Space and Planetary Science 3
- Cultural Studies 17
- Geography, Planning and Development 7
- History and Philosophy of Science 5
Countries citing papers authored by Alexandra Warwick
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexandra Warwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexandra Warwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexandra Warwick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alexandra Warwick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexandra Warwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexandra Warwick. The network helps show where Alexandra Warwick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Alexandra Warwick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 4 | Jack the Ripper: media, culture, history | 2007 | 10 |
| 5 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 7 | Repositioning Victorian sciences: shifting centres in nineteenth-century thinking | 2006 | 2 |
| 8 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 0 |
About Alexandra Warwick
Alexandra Warwick is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Political Science and International Relations and Urban Studies, having authored 10 papers that have together received 57 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (1 paper), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (1 paper), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (1 paper), Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics (1 paper), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (1 paper), Irish and British Studies (1 paper), Urban Planning and Governance (1 paper) and Australian Indigenous Culture and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (26 citations), Space and Planetary Science (3 citations), Cultural Studies (17 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (7 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (5 citations). Alexandra Warwick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Martin Willis, Terry Eagleton, Laura Chrisman, Stephen Regan, Ruth Robbins, Anne Janowitz, Carolyn Williams, Sally Ledger, Judith Halberstam and Regenia Gagnier. Their work appears in journals such as Nineteenth Century Contexts, Gothic Studies, City, Social & Legal Studies and Anthem Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.