Alan Grieve
Impact in
- Safety Research top 5%
- Disability Rights and Representation
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Family and Disability Support Research
Papers in
-
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 5
- Child Abuse and Trauma 3
- Family and Disability Support Research 3
-
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 4
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 2
- Co-authors
- William R. Lindsay (6 shared papers)З. Маршалл (3 shared papers)Amanda M. Michie (3 shared papers)Derek Carson (1 shared paper)Zoe Edwards (1 shared paper)Lesley Murphy (1 shared paper)Gordon S. Smith (1 shared paper)Nicola Cogan (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Learning Disabilities (2 papers)Sexual Abuse (2 papers)Autism (2 papers)Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities (2 papers)Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Alan Grieve
10 papers receiving 226 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Safety Research 78
- Clinical Psychology 178
- Health 21
- Demography 24
- Gender Studies 18
Countries citing papers authored by Alan Grieve
This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Grieve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Grieve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Grieve more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alan Grieve
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Grieve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Grieve. The network helps show where Alan Grieve may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alan Grieve, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 46 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 38 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 0 |
About Alan Grieve
Alan Grieve is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Safety Research and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 12 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers) and Disability Rights and Representation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (78 citations), Clinical Psychology (178 citations), Health (21 citations), Demography (24 citations) and Gender Studies (18 citations). Alan Grieve has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William R. Lindsay, З. Маршалл, Amanda M. Michie, Derek Carson, Zoe Edwards, Lesley Murphy, Gordon S. Smith, Nicola Cogan, Daniel V. Murphy and Steven J. Young. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Learning Disabilities, Sexual Abuse, Autism, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities and Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.