Aimee E. Miller‐Ott

725 citations
28 papers · 527 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Aimee E. Miller‐Ott

27 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Aimee E. Miller‐Ott
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Social Psychology 200
  • Human-Computer Interaction 58
  • Communication 61
  • Sociology and Political Science 332
  • Literature and Literary Theory 75
Replace Joshua D. Wondra with:
Joshua D. Wondra United States
Stanislav Treger United States
Brooks Aylor United States
Liesel L. Sharabi United States
Heidi Reeder United States
Shu‐Sha Angie Guan United States
Thuy-vy Thi Nguyen United Kingdom
Lucy Osler United Kingdom
Glen H. Stamp United States
Robin M. Akert United States
Aimee E. Miller‐Ott relative to Joshua D. Wondra United States Joshua D. Wondra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Joshua D. Wondra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Aimee E. Miller‐Ott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aimee E. Miller‐Ott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aimee E. Miller‐Ott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aimee E. Miller‐Ott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aimee E. Miller‐Ott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aimee E. Miller‐Ott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aimee E. Miller‐Ott. The network helps show where Aimee E. Miller‐Ott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Aimee E. Miller‐Ott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Aimee E. Miller‐Ott Line = papers co-authored together Aimee E. Miller‐Ott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201584
2 201272
3 201758
4 201749
5 201733
6 201430
7 201926
8 201523
9 201822
10 201817
11 201316
12 201115
13 201714
14 202110
15 20228
16 20168
17 20137
18 20196
19 20135
20 20224

About Aimee E. Miller‐Ott

Aimee E. Miller‐Ott is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Language and Linguistics, Clinical Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 28 papers that have together received 527 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (12 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (9 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (7 papers), Digital Communication and Language (4 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (3 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (3 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (3 papers) and Family Support in Illness (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (200 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (58 citations), Communication (61 citations), Sociology and Political Science (332 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (75 citations). Aimee E. Miller‐Ott has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Lynne Kelly and Robert L. Duran. Their work appears in journals such as Communication Quarterly, Journal of Family Communication, Communication Studies, Western Journal of Communication and Communication Research Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact