A.A.M. Oomens

792 citations
43 papers · 704 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

A.A.M. Oomens

41 papers receiving 669 citations

Peers

A.A.M. Oomens
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 613
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 303
  • Aerospace Engineering 116
  • Materials Chemistry 213
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 75
Replace Clément Laviron with:
Clément Laviron France
G. Cima United States
A. Rudyj Germany
Th. Oyevaar Netherlands
H. J. Hartfuß Germany
Jesús J. RAMOS United States
A. Jacchia Italy
Rulon K. Linford United States
Stephen Fairfax United States
Aunovro H. Sen United States
A.A.M. Oomens relative to Clément Laviron France Clément Laviron's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Clément Laviron · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A.A.M. Oomens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.A.M. Oomens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.A.M. Oomens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.A.M. Oomens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.A.M. Oomens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.A.M. Oomens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.A.M. Oomens. The network helps show where A.A.M. Oomens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A.A.M. Oomens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A.A.M. Oomens Line = papers co-authored together A.A.M. Oomens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997115
2 199783
3 199780
4 199472
5 197649
6 200246
7 199636
8 199933
9 198714
10 200214
11 198614
12 199613
13 199413
14 200213
15 200111
16 20019
17 19979
18 19958
19 19958
20 19937

About A.A.M. Oomens

A.A.M. Oomens is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 43 papers that have together received 704 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (23 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (13 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (9 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (8 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (7 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (6 papers), Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (5 papers) and Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (613 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (303 citations), Aerospace Engineering (116 citations), Materials Chemistry (213 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (75 citations). A.A.M. Oomens has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include F. C. Schüller, Niek J. Lopes Cardozo, G. M. D. Hogeweij, F. Salzedas, C. C. Chu, Marco R. de Baar, Clemens Barth, Jos de Kloe, Ronald R. Parker and Robert J. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Fusion Engineering and Design, Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Fusion, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact