A.A.M. Oomens

786 citations
37 papers · 523 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

A.A.M. Oomens

36 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

A.A.M. Oomens
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 438
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 218
  • Aerospace Engineering 88
  • Materials Chemistry 158
  • Condensed Matter Physics 22
Replace S.C. McCool with:
S.C. McCool United States
S. Sudo Japan
S. Prager United States
B. Joye Switzerland
R. Prentice United Kingdom
M.G. McCoy United States
M.H. Hughes United Kingdom
T. Hellsten Sweden
G. Cima United States
R.K. Linford United States
A.A.M. Oomens relative to S.C. McCool United States S.C. McCool's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
S.C. McCool · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A.A.M. Oomens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.A.M. Oomens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.A.M. Oomens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.A.M. Oomens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.A.M. Oomens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.A.M. Oomens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.A.M. Oomens. The network helps show where A.A.M. Oomens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A.A.M. Oomens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A.A.M. Oomens Line = papers co-authored together A.A.M. Oomens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199773
2 199770
3 199464
4 197645
5 200234
6 199633
7 199928
8 198714
9 198614
10 199413
11 200212
12 199612
13 200210
14 200110
15 19958
16 19958
17 20018
18 19947
19 19977
20 19936

About A.A.M. Oomens

A.A.M. Oomens is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 523 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (20 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (12 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (8 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (8 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (7 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (4 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (4 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (438 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (218 citations), Aerospace Engineering (88 citations), Materials Chemistry (158 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (22 citations). A.A.M. Oomens has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include F. C. Schüller, N.J. Lopes Cardozo, G. M. D. Hogeweij, C. C. Chu, M.R. de Baar, F. Salzedas, Clemens Barth, Jos de Kloe, R. R. Parker and Robert J. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Fusion Engineering and Design, Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Fusion, Review of Scientific Instruments and Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact