A. Naim
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Papers in
-
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 4
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 3
-
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 3
- Co-authors
- Michael C. Storrie‐Lombardi (3 shared papers)L. Sodré (3 shared papers)O. Lahav (2 shared papers)R. E. Griffiths (3 shared papers)K. U. Ratnatunga (3 shared papers)H. G. Corwin (2 shared papers)Somak Raychaudhury (2 shared papers)Alan Dressler (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (3 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (2 papers)The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (1 paper)Science (1 paper)Vistas in Astronomy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilRussia
In The Last Decade
A. Naim
9 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Instrumentation 121
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 225
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 66
- Signal Processing 29
- Analytical Chemistry 21
Countries citing papers authored by A. Naim
This map shows the geographic impact of A. Naim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Naim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Naim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. Naim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Naim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Naim. The network helps show where A. Naim may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. Naim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 79 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 64 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 60 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 46 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 26 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 21 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 3 |
About A. Naim
A. Naim is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Ecology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (4 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (3 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (3 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (3 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (2 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (2 papers), Remote-Sensing Image Classification (2 papers) and Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (121 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (225 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (66 citations), Signal Processing (29 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (21 citations). A. Naim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Michael C. Storrie‐Lombardi, L. Sodré, O. Lahav, R. E. Griffiths, K. U. Ratnatunga, H. G. Corwin, Somak Raychaudhury, Alan Dressler, J. P. Huchra and R. Buta. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astrophysical Journal, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Science and Vistas in Astronomy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.