A. Mark Smith

683 citations
28 papers · 198 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

A. Mark Smith

23 papers receiving 167 citations

Peers

A. Mark Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • History and Philosophy of Science 79
  • Theoretical Computer Science 11
  • Anthropology 32
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 16
  • Philosophy 31
Replace Christopher Cullen with:
Christopher Cullen United Kingdom
Bruce S. Eastwood United States
Domenico Bertoloni Meli United States
George Sarton United States
J. V. Field United Kingdom
André Goddu United States
Alexander Jones Canada
Roger Bacon
Giorgio de Santillana United States
Alfred J. Freddoso United States
A. Mark Smith relative to Christopher Cullen United Kingdom Christopher Cullen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Christopher Cullen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. Mark Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Mark Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Mark Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Mark Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Mark Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Mark Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Mark Smith. The network helps show where A. Mark Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside A. Mark Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. Mark Smith Line = papers co-authored together A. Mark Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199666
2 198717
3 199917
4 198214
5 199813
6 200111
7 19818
8 19857
9 19956
10 19766
11 20054
12 19924
13 19924
14 20054
15 20223
16 19993
17 20012
18 20082
19
Book Five of Alhacen's De Aspectibus
20062
20 20102

About A. Mark Smith

A. Mark Smith is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, History and Philosophy of Science, Archeology, Philosophy and Classics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 198 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (9 papers), History of Science and Medicine (6 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (5 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (5 papers), Architecture and Art History Studies (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers) and Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (79 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (11 citations), Anthropology (32 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (16 citations) and Philosophy (31 citations). A. Mark Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Richard Olson, Masashi Kamogawa, Toshiyasu Nagao, Serge Guillas, Glenn D. Starkman, Craig J. Copi and P. D. Church. Their work appears in journals such as Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, Isis, Early Science and Medicine, Journal of the History of Ideas and Folklore.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact