A. Mark Smith

546 citations
28 papers · 312 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

A. Mark Smith

23 papers receiving 232 citations

Peers

A. Mark Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • History and Philosophy of Science 151
  • Theoretical Computer Science 16
  • Philosophy 80
  • Anthropology 55
  • Classics 16
Replace Bruce S. Eastwood with:
Bruce S. Eastwood United States
Roger Bacon
Jasper Hopkins United States
Sylvia Berryman Canada
George Sarton United States
Pauline Phemister United Kingdom
Dennis Des Chene United States
Alfred J. Freddoso United States
Paul Thom Australia
Leroy E. Loemker United States
A. Mark Smith relative to Bruce S. Eastwood United States Bruce S. Eastwood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Bruce S. Eastwood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. Mark Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Mark Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Mark Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Mark Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Mark Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Mark Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Mark Smith. The network helps show where A. Mark Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside A. Mark Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. Mark Smith Line = papers co-authored together A. Mark Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199682
2 197645
3 198726
4 199924
5 198219
6 200119
7 200518
8 199816
9 19819
10 19958
11 20057
12 19857
13 19926
14 19995
15 19925
16
Book Five of Alhacen's De Aspectibus
20064
17 20013
18 20082
19 20102
20 19902

About A. Mark Smith

A. Mark Smith is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, History and Philosophy of Science, Archeology, Philosophy and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 28 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (12 papers), History of Science and Medicine (9 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (6 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (5 papers), Architecture and Art History Studies (4 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (3 papers), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (3 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (151 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (16 citations), Philosophy (80 citations), Anthropology (55 citations) and Classics (16 citations). A. Mark Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard Olson. Their work appears in journals such as Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, Isis, Philosophical Topics, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences and Journal of the History of Ideas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact