A. J. Booth

1.1k citations
23 papers · 362 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

A. J. Booth

22 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers

A. J. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Instrumentation 87
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 211
  • Analytical Chemistry 46
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 129
  • Pharmacology 30
Replace Bradford B. Behr with:
Bradford B. Behr United States
Yu Yu China
F. Delplancke Germany
Alexis Hill Canada
Nicole G. Czakon United States
Olivier Flasseur France
Fang-Ting Yuan China
Giorgio Bagnasco Italy
Robert Bassett Australia
Guðmundur Stefánsson United States
A. J. Booth relative to Bradford B. Behr United States Bradford B. Behr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Bradford B. Behr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. J. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. J. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. J. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. J. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. J. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. J. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. J. Booth. The network helps show where A. J. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. J. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. J. Booth Line = papers co-authored together A. J. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200062
2 201152
3 199946
4 199524
5 200823
6 200122
7 200621
8 200719
9 199916
10 201014
11 200312
12 200112
13 20106
14 20046
15 20016
16 20065
17 20104
18 20064
19
The Keck Interferometer: Instrument Overview and Proposed Science
19993
20 20112

About A. J. Booth

A. J. Booth is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Instrumentation, Computational Mechanics and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 23 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (11 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (8 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (6 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (5 papers), Chromatography in Natural Products (5 papers), Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (3 papers) and Food Quality and Safety Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (87 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (211 citations), Analytical Chemistry (46 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (129 citations) and Pharmacology (30 citations). A. J. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John Davis, W. J. Tango, Gary J. Lye, Theo A. ten Brummelaar, M. Hoare, M. M. Colavita, Stefan Martin, Eugene Serabyn, M. Susana Levy and W. C. Danchi. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies and Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact