A. Grant
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.1%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 133
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 57
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 33
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 22
- Oceanography 43
- Geophysics and Gravity Measurements 43
- Co-authors
- James Hough (3 shared papers)Kenneth Strain (3 shared papers)Mark Andrew Barton (3 shared papers)Sheila Rowan (3 shared papers)Angus Bell (2 shared papers)C. A. Cantley (2 shared papers)Alan V. Cumming (2 shared papers)A. Heptonstall (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Physical review. D (25 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (20 papers)Physical Review Letters (17 papers)Classical and Quantum Gravity (13 papers)The Astrophysical Journal Letters (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
A. Grant
136 papers receiving 36.3k citations
A. Grant's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 33.5k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 11.6k
- Geophysics 4.5k
- Oceanography 4.1k
- Ocean Engineering 2.4k
Countries citing papers authored by A. Grant
This map shows the geographic impact of A. Grant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Grant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Grant more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. Grant
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Grant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Grant. The network helps show where A. Grant may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. Grant, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 136 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 9808 |
| 2 | GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 6925 |
| 3 | Advanced LIGO Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 2689 |
| 4 | GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2 Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 1776 |
| 5 | GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M ⊙ Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 1022 |
| 6 | Exploring the sensitivity of next generation gravitational wave detectors Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 920 |
| 7 | GW170608: Observation of a 19 Solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 881 |
| 8 | Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 865 |
| 9 | Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 843 |
| 10 | Predictions for the rates of compact binary coalescences observable by ground-based gravitational-wave detectors Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 812 |
| 11 | Binary Black Hole Mergers in the first Advanced LIGO Observing Run Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 629 |
| 12 | GW150914: The Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Era of First Discoveries Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 540 |
| 13 | GW190412: Observation of a binary-black-hole coalescence with asymmetric masses Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 508 |
| 14 | GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 358 |
| 15 | Prospects for Observing and Localizing Gravitational-Wave Transients with Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo | 2016 | 279 |
| 16 | 2016 | 277 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 258 | |
| 18 | Search for the isotropic stochastic background using data from Advanced LIGO’s second observing run Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 245 |
| 19 | 2016 | 219 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 211 |
About A. Grant
A. Grant is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography, Geophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Ocean Engineering, having authored 136 papers that have together received 37.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (133 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (57 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (43 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (33 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (22 papers), Geophysics and Sensor Technology (21 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (13 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (33.5k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (11.6k citations), Geophysics (4.5k citations), Oceanography (4.1k citations) and Ocean Engineering (2.4k citations). A. Grant has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James Hough, Kenneth Strain, Mark Andrew Barton, Sheila Rowan, Angus Bell, C. A. Cantley, Alan V. Cumming, A. Heptonstall, Iain William Martin and Giles D. Hammond. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, The Astrophysical Journal, Physical Review Letters, Classical and Quantum Gravity and The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.