A Chikamoto
Impact in
- Hepatology top 10%
- Liver physiology and pathology
-
- MicroRNA in disease regulation
- Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Toru Beppu (10 shared papers)Hiromitsu Hayashi (8 shared papers)Daisuke Hashimoto (10 shared papers)Hidetoshi Nitta (7 shared papers)Kosuke Mima (3 shared papers)Taishi Higashi (5 shared papers)Masayuki Watanabe (3 shared papers)Takatsugu Ishimoto (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (6 papers)British journal of surgery (4 papers)British Journal of Cancer (3 papers)Nature Communications (1 paper)HPB (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesFinland
In The Last Decade
A Chikamoto
16 papers receiving 340 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Hepatology 67
- Cancer Research 78
- Cell Biology 62
- Oncology 90
- Molecular Biology 131
Countries citing papers authored by A Chikamoto
This map shows the geographic impact of A Chikamoto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Chikamoto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Chikamoto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A Chikamoto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A Chikamoto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A Chikamoto. The network helps show where A Chikamoto may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside A Chikamoto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 92 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 58 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 7 | Endogenous TNF inducibility and prognosis of colorectal cancer. | 1999 | 9 |
| 8 | Relationship between microvessel quantification and inducibility of endogenous tumor necrosis factor in colorectal adenocarcinoma. | 2000 | 9 |
| 9 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2026 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 0 |
About A Chikamoto
A Chikamoto is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cell Biology and Physiology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (3 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers), Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper), Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (1 paper) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (67 citations), Cancer Research (78 citations), Cell Biology (62 citations), Oncology (90 citations) and Molecular Biology (131 citations). A Chikamoto has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Toru Beppu, Hiromitsu Hayashi, Daisuke Hashimoto, Hidetoshi Nitta, Kosuke Mima, Taishi Higashi, Masayuki Watanabe, Takatsugu Ishimoto, Shigeki Nakagawa and Hideo Baba. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, British journal of surgery, British Journal of Cancer, Nature Communications and HPB.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.