A. Bultel

7 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

A. Bultel
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Applied Mathematics 173
  • Computational Mechanics 132
  • Mechanics of Materials 110
  • Aerospace Engineering 80
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 91
Replace David Vanden Abeele with:
David Vanden Abeele Belgium
Richard Gessman United States
Megan E. MacDonald United States
V. V. Kalyada Russia
Viviana Lago France
O. P. Shatalov Russia
P. C. T. de Boer United States
Jesse W. Streicher United States
Tobias Hermann United Kingdom
C. Catalfamo Italy
A. Bultel relative to David Vanden Abeele Belgium David Vanden Abeele's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
David Vanden Abeele · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. Bultel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Bultel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Bultel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Bultel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Bultel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Bultel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Bultel. The network helps show where A. Bultel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside A. Bultel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. Bultel Line = papers co-authored together A. Bultel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2009149
2 200965
3 200849
4 201036
5 200830
6 200518
7
Collisional-radiative modeling in flow simulations
20083

About A. Bultel

A. Bultel is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 7 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (5 papers), Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect (2 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (2 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (2 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (2 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (2 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (2 papers) and Ion-surface interactions and analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (173 citations), Computational Mechanics (132 citations), Mechanics of Materials (110 citations), Aerospace Engineering (80 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (91 citations). A. Bultel has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include B. G. Chéron, Thierry Magin, Anne Bourdon, Olivier Chazot, Marco Panesi, Virginie Morel, C. Rond, Pascal Boubert and Xin Tu. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Physics, High Temperature Material Processes An International Quarterly of High-Technology Plasma Processes, Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy and International Journal of Thermophysics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact