Countries where authors publish in Wildlife Society Bulletin
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Wildlife Society Bulletin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Wildlife Society Bulletin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wildlife Society Bulletin more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Wildlife Society Bulletin
This network shows the impact of papers published in Wildlife Society Bulletin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Wildlife Society Bulletin.
About Wildlife Society Bulletin
The 539 papers published in Wildlife Society Bulletin in the last decades have received a total of 16.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Wildlife Society Bulletin usually cover Ecology (451 papers), Ecological Modeling (54 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (118 papers), Developmental Biology (15 papers) and Small Animals (51 papers) specifically the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (319 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (186 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (109 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (65 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (54 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (46 papers), Ecology and biodiversity studies (40 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Wildlife Society Bulletin are Jeff Jenness, William L. Baker, Paul R. Krausman, Kerry L. Nicholson, Fred B. Samson, Fritz L. Knopf, James W. Cain, Steven S. Rosenstock, Kurt C. VerCauteren and Miguel A. Acevedo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.