Countries where authors publish in Welding Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Welding Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Welding Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Welding Journal more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Welding Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Welding Journal.
About Welding Journal
The 761 papers published in Welding Journal in the last decades have received a total of 12.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Welding Journal usually cover Metals and Alloys (116 papers), Mechanical Engineering (651 papers), Mechanics of Materials (196 papers), General Materials Science (21 papers) and Aerospace Engineering (102 papers) specifically the topics of Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses (445 papers), Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis (179 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (127 papers), Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (116 papers), Metal Alloys Wear and Properties (74 papers), Non-Destructive Testing Techniques (72 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (68 papers) and Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Welding Journal are John C. Lippold, Kevin J. Colligan, Thomas W. Eagar, John N. DuPont, N. S. Tsai, Suck-Joo Na, C. Dawes, W. M. Thomas, Niels Bay and Pan Michaleris.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.