Veterinary Record

16.6k papers and 253.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 16.6k papers published in Veterinary Record in the last decades have received a total of 253.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Veterinary Record usually cover Small Animals (4.7k papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (2.8k papers) and Animal Science and Zoology (2.6k papers) specifically the topics of Microbial infections and disease research (1.7k papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (1.3k papers) and Helminth infection and control (1.1k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Veterinary Record are T. G. Knowles, P. D. Warriss, H. Dobson, G.C. Coles, Laura Green, William Ellis, R. Gough, U. Braun, David B. Morton and E. Paul J. Gibbs.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Veterinary Record

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Veterinary Record. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Veterinary Record.

Countries where authors publish in Veterinary Record

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Veterinary Record. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Veterinary Record with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veterinary Record more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025