Transnational Environmental Law

304 papers and 2.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 304 papers published in Transnational Environmental Law in the last decades have received a total of 2.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Transnational Environmental Law usually cover Law (188 papers), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (106 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (95 papers) specifically the topics of Environmental law and policy (175 papers), International Environmental Law and Policies (71 papers) and Climate Change and Geoengineering (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Transnational Environmental Law are Louis J. Kotzé, Kenneth W. Abbott, Benoît Mayer, Jacqueline Peel, Mihnea Tănăsescu, Edward A. Parson, Paola Villavicencio Calzadilla, Kyla Tienhaara, Hari M. Osofsky and Joana Setzer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Transnational Environmental Law

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Transnational Environmental Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Transnational Environmental Law.

Countries where authors publish in Transnational Environmental Law

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Transnational Environmental Law. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Transnational Environmental Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Transnational Environmental Law more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025