Trabajos de Prehistoria

869 papers and 5.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 869 papers published in Trabajos de Prehistoria in the last decades have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Trabajos de Prehistoria usually cover Archeology (678 papers), Anthropology (129 papers) and Paleontology (88 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeological and Historical Studies (574 papers), Archaeological and Geological Studies (548 papers) and Medieval Architecture and Archaeology (304 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Trabajos de Prehistoria are Felipe Criado Boado, Ignacio Montero Ruíz, Patricia Murrieta‐Flores, Pedro Díaz del Río Español, Martín Almagro Gorbea, Lawrence Guy Straus, Leonardo García Sanjuán, Salvador Rovira Lloréns, José Yravedra and Paloma de la Peña.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Trabajos de Prehistoria

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Trabajos de Prehistoria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Trabajos de Prehistoria.

Countries where authors publish in Trabajos de Prehistoria

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Trabajos de Prehistoria. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Trabajos de Prehistoria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trabajos de Prehistoria more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025