Translation Review

343 papers and 718 indexed citations i.

About

The 343 papers published in Translation Review in the last decades have received a total of 718 indexed citations. Papers published in Translation Review usually cover Language and Linguistics (93 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (50 papers) and Cultural Studies (21 papers) specifically the topics of Translation Studies and Practices (86 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (9 papers) and Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (8 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Translation Review are Rainer Schulte, Carol Maier, Harry Aveling, Michael Scott Doyle, Marilyn Booth, Katherine King, José Ortéga y Gassét, Janis Forman, Mary Jane White and Lawrence Venuti.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Translation Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Translation Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Translation Review.

Countries where authors publish in Translation Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Translation Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Translation Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Translation Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025