ACM Transactions on Internet Technology

23.5k citations
792 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Recommender Systems and Techniques
    • Web Data Mining and Analysis
    • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
    • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
    • Spam and Phishing Detection
    • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
    • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
    • Caching and Content Delivery

Papers in

ACM Transactions on Internet Technology

759 papers receiving 22.0k citations

Peers

ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
Comparison fields: 5 of 192
  • Information Systems 11.1k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 9.6k
  • Artificial Intelligence 9.1k
  • Signal Processing 2.6k
  • Computer Science Applications 760
Replace Computer Science Review with:
Computer Science Review India
ACM Transactions on the Web United States
Journal of Web Semantics Germany
The Knowledge Engineering Review United Kingdom
IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing United States
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery United States
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems United States
ACM SIGIR Forum United States
IEEE Transactions on Big Data China
Advances in computers United States
ACM Transactions on Internet Technology relative to Computer Science Review India Computer Science Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Computer Science Review · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in ACM Transactions on Internet Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACM Transactions on Internet Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACM Transactions on Internet Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACM Transactions on Internet Technology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in ACM Transactions on Internet Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ACM Transactions on Internet Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACM Transactions on Internet Technology.

About ACM Transactions on Internet Technology

The 792 papers published in ACM Transactions on Internet Technology in the last decades have received a total of 23.5k indexed citations . Papers published in ACM Transactions on Internet Technology usually cover Computer Networks and Communications (366 papers), Information Systems (337 papers), Artificial Intelligence (312 papers), Signal Processing (81 papers) and Computer Science Applications (40 papers) specifically the topics of IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (115 papers), Caching and Content Delivery (84 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (75 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (75 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (59 papers), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (56 papers), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (55 papers) and Cryptography and Data Security (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACM Transactions on Internet Technology are Roy T. Fielding, Richard N. Taylor, Michalis Vazirgiannis, Magdalini Eirinaki, Jennifer Golbeck, Junghoo Cho, Héctor García-Molina, Neil Hurley, James Hendler and Marjory S. Blumenthal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact