ACM Transactions on Computational Logic

8.1k citations
576 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Formal Methods in Verification
    • semigroups and automata theory
    • Advanced Algebra and Logic
    • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
    • Logic, programming, and type systems
    • Semantic Web and Ontologies
    • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation

Papers in

    • Formal Methods in Verification 250
    • semigroups and automata theory 92
    • Advanced Algebra and Logic 58
    • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 326
    • Logic, programming, and type systems 323
    • Semantic Web and Ontologies 91
    • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation 57

ACM Transactions on Computational Logic

517 papers receiving 7.4k citations

Peers

ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 4.2k
  • Artificial Intelligence 6.4k
  • Software 733
  • Computer Networks and Communications 1.6k
  • Hardware and Architecture 332
Replace The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming with:
The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming United Kingdom
Logical Methods in Computer Science France
The Journal of Logic Programming United States
AI Communications Spain
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming United States
Complex Systems United States
RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications France
International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation China
Journal of Functional Programming United States
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines United States
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic relative to The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming United Kingdom The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACM Transactions on Computational Logic more than expected).

Fields of papers published in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic.

About ACM Transactions on Computational Logic

The 576 papers published in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic in the last decades have received a total of 8.1k indexed citations . Papers published in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic usually cover Computational Theory and Mathematics (400 papers), Artificial Intelligence (487 papers), Software (41 papers), Computer Networks and Communications (98 papers) and Signal Processing (24 papers) specifically the topics of Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (326 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (323 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (250 papers), semigroups and automata theory (92 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (91 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (58 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (57 papers) and Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic are Yuri Gurevich, Vladimir Lifschitz, Thomas Eiter, Georg Gottlob, Marek Sergot, Alessio Guglielmi, Agustín Valverde, David Pearce, Dexter Kozen and Nicola Leone.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact