ACM Transactions on Computational Logic

12.4k citations
606 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Formal Methods in Verification 264
    • semigroups and automata theory 99
    • Advanced Algebra and Logic 63
    • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 343
    • Logic, programming, and type systems 339
    • Semantic Web and Ontologies 95
    • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation 58

ACM Transactions on Computational Logic

554 papers receiving 11.6k citations

Peers

ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 6.7k
  • Software 1.2k
  • Artificial Intelligence 10.0k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 2.3k
  • Hardware and Architecture 530
Replace The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming with:
The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming United Kingdom
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming United States
The Journal of Logic Programming United States
AI Communications Spain
Natural computing series United Kingdom
Journal of Functional Programming United States
Constraints France
Journal of Heuristics United States
International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation China
IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine China
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic relative to The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming United Kingdom The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACM Transactions on Computational Logic more than expected).

Fields of papers published in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic.

About ACM Transactions on Computational Logic

The 606 papers published in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic in the last decades have received a total of 12.4k indexed citations . Papers published in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic usually cover Computational Theory and Mathematics (423 papers), Artificial Intelligence (515 papers), Software (42 papers), Computer Networks and Communications (102 papers) and Signal Processing (24 papers) specifically the topics of Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (343 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (339 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (264 papers), semigroups and automata theory (99 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (95 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (63 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (58 papers) and Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic are Yuri Gurevich, Vladimir Lifschitz, Thomas Eiter, Marek Sergot, Georg Gottlob, Moshe Y. Vardi, Orna Kupferman, Agustín Valverde, David Pearce and Dexter Kozen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact